An argument in favor of policemen wearing body cameras to reduce claims and improve peoples trust

Fourth, this will protect good police officers from false accusations, and have the reverse effect for bad police officers. We live in an age where technology reigns free and cameras are everywhere.

Unlike people, the cameras are unable to lie so they will protect any false accusations, misconduct and abuse against officers. These body cameras should distributed to police stations in all the states because as we continue to develop more and more into the digital age it will help the officers so much more.

I will say no more until a debate opponent emerges. Incidences of use of force by police and complaints against police plunged the year after they were put into use. These cameras will keep track of what the officer says or does when at the scene of the crime, keeping them accountable.

It keeps track of the evidence at the scene, always surveys the actions of the officer and it would enhance the trust of the public.

5 Pros and Cons of Police Wearing Body Cameras

Accountability — Continuously wearing body cameras would hold police accountable for their appropriate, and inappropriate, conduct.

Civilians actions are going to be recorded everywhere but when it comes to footage of private property, higher ranked officers are authorized to deleting the footage if they feel that the footage is not of use to them.

These cameras will not always be the most dependable piece of technology.

What Happens When Police Officers Wear Body Cameras

March 30, Argumentive Essay; Should Police Officers be Allowed to Wear Body Cameras A police officer that is out on patrol sees a woman being beaten and robbed but when the officer pulls over to the scene the suspect had already gotten away while the officer checked on the woman.

Gone are the days when police can not be held accountable for their behavior. Police officers that wear these cameras must activate these cameras as they exit their patrol cars and are interacting with the civilians but officers can decide when to activate them, how long the footage is restored and if the footage would be accessible to public.

Do all defendants want their arrests recorded? Although the study of the Rialto police department came back with positive results, the fact remains that these the officers still have the ability to turn off these cameras whenever they choose to. Police stations in all the states should agree on letting officers wear an on officer recording systems: Body cameras could thus make the streets safer for both officers and the general public.

Police Should Wear Body Cameras

There was recently a case in which "an Albuquerque woman tried to flip the script on an Albuquerque Police officer, accusing him of sexual assault. Here are my terms for this debate: Report this Argument Pro I propose that police should wear body cameras.

Even though the suspect had gotten away, the camera that was attached to the officers uniform and on the dash of his squad car caught the face of the robber and they eventually caught him. When police cameras are on, they will capture everyday civilian and police behavior that does not necessarily need to be recorded.

Report this Argument Con The fact of the matter is that people need privacy. Although the cameras will provide crucial evidence for a case, the footage, like technology, can be manipulated.

Most people carry a smartphone with the ability to record events as they happen, and this footage appears frequently on the news and internet. First, they will be able to record what actually happens when citizens interact with police, thereby advancing accountability and transparency. Many current policies encourage the cameras to be turned on only when police are among the public.

He was wearing a camera on his lapel. The cameras will minimize the complaints about officers that use unnecessary force or inappropriate behavior from the officer or the residence. Intelligently make your points without condescension. Pro I am going to make the case that police departments across the country would be wise to require their officers to wear body cameras.Conceptually, there is no reason for officers not to don body cameras; however, the logistics of arming every officer in the nation with a body camera would present an obstacle.

It would be wise for officers to consider wearing such a device, whether or not this is the policy of the local law enforcement. 5 ways body-worn cameras have helped police officers However, in-car and body-worn cameras are best used together to form a more complete picture of the events surrounding an officer.

Cameras improve the behaviour of members of the public and reduce the number of bogus complaints brought against the police. They are an efficient way to collect evidence.

Mar 25,  · It is said that Rialto police officers used force 60% less when wearing the cameras. These body worn cameras would help instil trust in the public. The cameras will minimize the complaints about officers that use unnecessary force or inappropriate behavior from the officer or the residence.

Argumentive Essay; Should Police Officers be Allowed to Wear Body Cameras

Body cameras are compact and portable, and officers wear the camera throughout their shift. They are about the size of a deck of cards and can be mounted to hats, helmets, sunglasses, lapels or uniform collars.

An Argument in Favor of Policemen Wearing Body Cameras to Reduce Claims and Improve People's Trust PAGES 5.

Study Shows Less Violence, Fewer Complaints When Cops Wear Body Cameras

WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. - Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA.

Download
An argument in favor of policemen wearing body cameras to reduce claims and improve peoples trust
Rated 4/5 based on 40 review